Number of Prominent Republicans Back McCain

The Prominent Republicans in the state of Massachusetts are NOT backing their former Governor, Romney. It is no surprise given that they remember what condition the state was in during Romney's term as governor. The economic growth during that time in Massachusetts was their third lowest in the country, and the job increase was the third lowest in the country. Only the Katrina states were lower. And all these republicans remember the high number of the population who left the state.

The list of Bay State Republicans endorsing McCain, in his quest for the presidency, include former governors Paul Cellucci and Jane Swift, former treasurer Joe Malone and former State Republican Party Chair Jean Inman. The list includes USAID Administrator and former state lawmaker Andrew Natsios and former Massachusetts Republican Party Chairman Jim Rappaport. The list also includes a number of state lawmakers and 14 members of the Republican State Committee.

Romney may be able to fool Republicans who were not in the state of Massachusetts when he was governor. However, the Massachusetts Republicans remember the failing economy that Romney put them into. I guess that is why Republicans use the Elephant as their masscot, because 'An elephant never forgets.'

Investors of Google worried

Who would have ever thought that this would be an issue, but with today's economy plunging in a downward spiral it should have been predictable. 'Google Inc.'s top executives say all is well at the Internet search leader despite a rare earnings disappointment, but investors are worried something is amiss.' Yes this time has come, and with the corporations talking about tightening belts there's no question as to where in recent history we can put the blame. But no one wants to remember and admit that the Republican corporate lobbyists, and Bush, and big businesses through out the U.S.A. started the economic drop in 2002. That was when Bush and his Republican White House government pushed through a bill granting Big Business Corporations a 'Government Financial Incentive' to send American high tech and other jobs overseas changing the type of jobs left for Americans. That was during the time frame Bush announced "America is no longer a high tech country, but is now a service country." Boy did he and the republicans blow that one. What a legacy to leave behind.

No Jobs effects the economy

According to another report on the connection with jobs and the economy. There are even more jobs lost in the month of January, which makes it the biggest lost of jobs in three years stated in that report. The report talks of the unemployment rate in numbers and figures that the government has, yet one truth never comes out. Not everyone signs up. My husband is constantly taking jobs that are short term in his line of work of what are left the country thanks to Bush and his 'Government Financial Incentives' for big business to send American Jobs overseas in 2002 when my husband was already in his mid 50's. The lasp in-between jobs can reach beyond 6 months in any given year. Jobs were secured before GW Bush and his top Republican lobbyists. Secure jobs no longer exist thanks to Bush and the CEOs who have the attitude that "Americans NO Longer Have The Right To Work." I remember those words the CEOs and Republicans spoke so well, as if it were yesterday. But Bush and the Republicans forgot one important little detail: In order to have a working economy, there has to be people in that economy working. NO JOBS =EQUALS= NO WORKING ECONOMY. How could the Republicans not know that the two went hand-in-hand.

Please wake me up from this nightmare.

Avoiding The Word, Recession.

Bush talked of the importance of the stimulus package. He spoke of the decline in jobs. Yet one thing he failed to mention is that we are in a recession.

GW and the Republicans are so quick to lay the blame, but they forgot one thing. It is not a very small thing. It is not something that is well hidden. It is not something they never even heard of. In fact this one thing has Bush's signature and the signature of Republicans. It was something that they passed, a bill from 2002. I wonder if anyone remembers the bill. It was the bill to give 'GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL INCENTIVES TO BIG BUSINESS' to move American jobs away from Americans and send those jobs overseas.

Yep, it is true that Bush is now admitting that the economy is failing. But GW is failing short of blaming himself and his Republican people for the downswing in the economy.

You see, both Bush and the Republican people have forgotten one thing, to have a 'WORKING ECONOMY' is to have the people in that economy working. No jobs, no working economy. The two go hand-in-hand.

Using Them Who Cannot Defend Themselves

There are many abuses of the handicap around the world. In fact there is many with in our own borders in the U.S. Yet there is one abuse that really makes it harder to swallow. One abuse that really turns the stomach. One that goes beyond the realm of evil. And that one is to take a mentally retarded individual, and strap a bomb on that individual while putting that person in a busy market place where many families and friends gather.

But I just could not imagine an evil so vicious as to send two mentally retarded females strapped with bombs to blow them up in a busy spot and cause the massive carnage which occurred today in Iraq. These must be desperate times for those who want the new government to fail in Iraq, to have stooped so low. Their ends will be defined not by their beliefs but by their actions. And their actions have stained their souls with the blood of innocent.

Is The Bush Strategy Really Working?

It has been a while since Bush and Rumsfeld first pulled all our troops out of Afghanistan in 2003, and dropped the idea of going after the ones truely responsible for the 9/11 attack in Manhattan, New York. Yes, both George W and Rumsfeld believed that going after the big mouth Sadam with the mosaic tile image of Bush Sr flooring mat on the grounds of Iraq government building was far more important, then getting Bin Laden, al Qaeda, and the Taliban who all declared 'Death to America' slogan. GW was happy at go after Sadam for wiping his shoes on the tile picture of Bush Sr face. But they did say that there was an Iranian informant from the Iranian government who told their sources about WMD's in Iraq. But would the Iranian say anything against an enemy. We do know that Iranians and Iraqi have been enemy's for almost as long as the both groups have existed. Yep, it is true that both GW Bush and Rumsfeld were the most gullible boys in America at that time. Well, there were no WMD's. In fact the only discovery that is now being seriously looked at is the possibility of nuclear WMD's build up in Iran. Being so tied up in Iraq, Bush did not see it coming.

But more has happened since that March 23, 2003 when our soldiers first marched across fighting in Iraq. It seems that after these years of the free Iraqi building their own government a secontarian violence between the Suni and Shiet has broken out. While Iraqi were killing one another, a new problem developed. Al Qaeda filterated into Iraq and are killing Iraqi no matter what group or religion they are, as well as Americans who are there. Still the method of bombings used by the insurgencies, and al Qaeda are changing and building more violent.

Oh I know that our government with their latest tactics, which even John McCain took credit for, claim their strategy to be working. Yet, with the level of violence that keeps happening in Iraq, I can not help but wonder what the Bush Republican idea of working is?

Coulter To Back Hillary IF...?

"I will vote for Hillary over McCain." A statement that shocked everyone, including me. And I am not one who would care whom Ann Coulter would back, because I view her as a conniving evil non-truth, 'half-truth person. She often goes for the jugular against anyone who is not a Conservative Republican. She has been the most out spoken against the Clintons since Monica Lewinsky and the sex scandal. Is Ann setting up Clinton for her known type of future tactics in her arsenal of back stabbing, verbal, insulting, humiliating puns?

The Diva of "I'm a conservative Republican so I'm always right" wants to do what? Coulter who wrote books on how to deceive and manipulate to attack the people who are not conservative Republican, says what? Sounds like an Ann Coulter set up to me. First off, Ann would back McCain because she, just like the other 100% conservative Republicans, believe John McCain to be on the side of Republican issues, like 'Staying the Bush course of Action.' She would never back anyone who is related to, in her view, a violation of trust in the 'White House with the Sex Scandal.' She has made that very clear.

Her books on lies and deception in manipulating people who are not main stream conservative, is working in her statement. When you read her books, the only candidates that fit whom she would vote for are Republicans. Of course she would prefer Huckabee, or Romney. And she would back the one whose party would amend the Constitution of the USA to fit her religious beliefs, which is a violation of the very first Amendment of the first ten Amendments ratified on Dec 15, 1791 and known as the 'Bill of Rights': "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..." That is not a suggestion, but a law. The definition of the word AMEND is: 'To make right.' What conservative Republicans want to do is strip everyone of us of our 'Bill of Rights'

When the dust settles, she will only back a Republican over a Democrat who would NOT 'Stay the Bush Course of Action.'