American Born Abroad Or Immigrant

The Definition of American Born Abroad: An American Citizen born in another country to parents who are United States Citizens.
The definition of Immigrant: A person born to foreign parents of one country who migrate to another country.

Mitt Romney made a blooper when he spoke of his father being a Mexican immigrant, at the January 26, 2012 Florida Republican Primary Debate. Was it deliberate mistake, a deliberate lie, to capture the Latino vote?

George Romney was born in Mexico: True.
George Romney migrated from Mexico: FALSE!!!

George Romney, Mitt Romney's father, was born in Mexico in July 08 1907 to parents who were citizens of the United States, who left Utah to live in a Mormon Community in Mexico. However when the Revolution in Mexico began, his Utah American Mormon parents, took their family BACK to the United States. Which means that George Romney was an AMERICAN BORN ABROAD who was returning to his home in the United States. Mitt Romney lied when he said that his father migrated to the United States of America. Mitt Romney deliberately exaggerated a lie when he said that his father was a Mexican immigrant.

Why did he lie? Mitt Romney LIED to get the Latino vote.

Sorry Mitt, but your father was NEVER a Mexican immigrant. George Romney, your father, was never an immigrant at all. George Romney was an AMERICAN BORN ABROAD, born to American parents, who only returned back home to the United States when his parents fled the war of the Mexican Revolution.

To Unlawfully Defraud

It has been a year of hustle and bustle. Being constantly busy with work and hardship. Hours being cut, even though the company did better this year than last year. Even though the company did better every single year than the year before. Even when the Economy had gone bust, Corporate was doing financially better than the year before. Even when Wall Street was loosing ground, Corporate America was doing very well. Even when Banks invested the Government issued TARP, instead of the purpose it was intended for, which was  to create new company start-ups. The establishment of Corporate America did better than they admit.

There is a pattern of falsehood which corporations have used to confuse and defraud the average American citizen. A falsehood in which Corporate America has used to fool those of us who do not understand that what is happening in Wall Street has absolutely nothing to do with what is happening in Corporate America. Every major corporation in the USA have lied about the need or reason to cut hours, cut wages for new hires or by-way-of not giving any raises at all and cut back on the labor force while they raised their prices for the goods and services they provide.

Beware, corporations are determined to turn American Workers into slave laborers with slave wages. An idea the Republicans have been trying to legislate into their own states. Yep, CEO's in Corporate America will be lining their pockets with gold while throwing bones to the American worker. Yet the average American Laborer wont even realize that corporations are the ones who created the high--number--of--unemployment without reason or purpose other than working against President Obama.

That proves that Corporate America is Republican controlled and Republican Run with the Republican agenda of lining their pockets with gold while working against President Obama instead of doing their patriotic duty of putting country first. The actions of Corporate America leave me with a feeling of disdain for the Federal Tax and State Tax systems that favor the Unpatriotic Corporate America.

Maybe, the IRS should be auditing the books of Corporate America. Something tells me there may be some creative artwork in the Corporate Ledger pages.

Child Labor Law

Here in the United States of America, in all my 58 years of existence, I never believed that we would ever be taking on a subject which in the past had some serious, dire consequences.

I read the some alarming articles and watched and listened to the news of some Republican Senators wanting to get rid of regulations, rules, and protections that are currently in place in their States Child Labor Laws and the Federal Child Labor Law.

Republican Senator Jane Cunningham from Missouri is pushing for her state to get rid of the protections and restrictions for children under the age of 14.

Republican Tea party Senator Mike Lee from Utah has declared the Child Labor Law as being Unconstitutional. So Utah's Republican Senator Mike Lee wants to get rid of the Child Labor Law altogether.

Have we forgotten the lessons of the past? Are we gonna be forced to repeat the past?

Unfortunately Child Labor in the United States of America before the Child Labor Laws were passed proved to be extremely dangerous for children. In a lot of cases even fatal! The known statistics of their suffered abuses on the job and working conditions were very harsh and deadly.

Is that the future Republicans want for our children?

Be careful for what you wish for. You just might get it.

Hidden Waste?

There's a lot of news on Republicans of Washington in Congress coming up with cuts.

There was some little news on speeches Democratic President Obama gave during the last 2 years with the lists of the same cuts and sacrifices, telling everyone 'We will have to bite the bullet". Remember?

But what about the hidden stuff. Did you know about the hidden stuff. There is no HIDDEN STUFF in the Republicans Plan. There is only a lot of SERVICES money cuts.

In California, Democratic Governor Jerry Brown found the hidden stuff from the previous Republican State Administration. The stuff no one thinks about, because no one knew. Like the cell phones Governor Brown placed on the chopping block saving billions of Tax Payer's money.

What about the Federal Government? Did anyone at the Federal level even bother to look? Cell phones that were being used for personal use, not needed for Government business. Chances are if SLASHING the California government cell phones saved a lot of tax revenue for the state in the millions, then chances are the SLASHING of cell phones for the Federal government would save even more, could be in the billions, possibly in the hundreds of billions or trillions! Don't laugh, thinking in terms of across the country it could just be that much.

In California, Democratic Governor Jerry Brown found that the Past Republican Ex-Governor Schwarzenegger Administration was selling Government property then Leasing it back at very high rates with Tax Payer's money. By CUTTING and STOPPING that practice, Democratic Jerry Brown saved California $Billions.

What are the chances that the Federal government during the Bush and Cheney years were wasting tax payers money at the Federal level across the country selling Federal land then leasing it back at high rates? Think of how much money would be saved if that practice was STOPPED. If the State of California saved $Billions, then the Federal government could save way more. Think of the possibilities.

In California, Democratic governor Jerry Brown also CUT OUT more Government waste when he found out that the Ex Governor, Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger was spending billions Yearly on fleets of new cars that were being used for private use and NOT Government business. The waste was on NON-emergency vehicles. Plus paying the home storage permits. These were New Cars Every Single Year. While California was broke. In the $Billions of Wasted state tax revenue.

Could the Federal government had been doing the same thing for years, for Decades? Did anyone check? Could there be hidden waste at the Federal level of the same across the country? Just how much could be saved if the Congress and Senate would STOP THAT SPENDING?

If the State of California Governor Democratic Jerry Brown manage to save over $$$$billions of government waste on those three examples alone, think of how much more the Federal Government could save at the Federal Level. Would it be in the Hundreds of Billions? Could it be in the Trillions? Possibly in the Hundreds of Trillions?

We will never know if the both Houses at the Federal level do not tackle the hidden wastes!

Correcting All The Wrongs

In listening to conservative media, we might think that Democrats spend while Republicans don't.

But that statement is far from the truth. In California Republicans have always had control of State government with greater more Republicans in California State Legislature. And when the Governor's office was Republican, well it was always a field day of spending.

Fact is that Ex-Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger splurged California Tax Payer's money on unnecessary spending, and it is those unnecessary spending that Democratic Governor Jerry Brown is NOW cutting while saving Billions of Dollars on Each of those that he is now cutting:

1) Cell phones for California State Government employees from Sacramento to local districts, government employees received cell phones bought and paid for with monthly payments on service all done with California Tax Payer's money.

2) Selling of California State Government Property, which was bought and paid for over a century and a half ago, only to lease the property back to the State Government at the expense of the California Tax Payers.

3) Then there is the California Tax Payer funded New Car Purchases for the State Funded Vehicle Fleet that were NEVER essential to the State Government business.

Republican Arnold's mistake was balancing the California State budget by stripping the Public School Funding and using that money to balance the books. Schwarzenegger stripped the money intended for fire fighting using that money to balance the State books while cutting back on fire fighters, fire fighting equipment and their services. Also Ex-Governor Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger stripped the money intended for police departments, using that money to balance the California State books while cutting back on the number of police and services. Yet Ex-Governor Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger just continued to get the State deeper and deeper into the RED DEBT. Do those Republican Schwarzenegger solution's sound familiar? They sure do. Chris Christie is doing the same Republican stuff that did not work for California in his New Jersey State, but will the people of New Jersey see the the parallel universe of the two states?

Well the New California State Governor, Jerry Brown, is having to 'Correct All Those Wrongs' in California. He is getting rid of those unnecessary expenses along with many more while restoring that which makes Californians feel safe, secure, and protects our future generations education. A task that only Jerry Brown knows very well. The same way Jerry Brown in the 1970's had to turn around a poorly financially handled California State which was mismanaged by then Republican Ex-Governor Ronald Regan, Jerry Brown is once again ridding the California State of another Republican's disastrous financial blunder caused by Ex-Governor Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger.

The difference between Republican Chris Christie, New Jersey Governor and Democratic Jerry Brown Governor is, while the Republican Chris Christie wrongly blames the Public Schools Teachers who are teaching our country's future and hopes for destroying New Jersey's economy, and as Republican Governor Chris Christie of New Jersy continues to attack the Fire Fighters who lay their lives on the line every day while he cuts away at their pensions and support, New Jersey will still not be able to fix their Financial mess because the real unnecessary wastes in New Jersey's State is not being dealt with.

Yet Democratic Governor Jerry Brown is taking a real look at the real Government wastes which will save California State in the Billions EACH. And that is just from the first three of real cuts Democratic Jerry Brown is making of which I have listed. Democratic Governor Jerry Brown took the State of California in the 1970's out of the Red after Ex-Governor Ronald Reagan bankrupt the state. And now, Democratic Governor Jerry Brown is at work again in 2011, using real Financial Budgeting Techniques that will put California back into the Black.

Californians forgot how great Jerry Brown was at Correcting The Wrongs when in 1980 they blamed him for the Flooding disastor caused by unusual higher rain fall and poor California soil. Yep, they blamed him for the California soil that cannot literally hold water, causing homes to wash away. But they were also angry that Jerry Brown was running for President , even though Jerry Brown immediately left the campaign and dropped from the Democratic Primary to deal with and clean up that mess. Yet Jerry Brown lost his bid for second term even though he fixed California's financial mess, a task of which NO governor has ever matched. Jerry Brown lost his bid for the second term because Californians blamed him for California's poor soil.

Well, Californians have their priorities straight now. We do understand that a State that has a great budget to work with is the State that never tries to balance the books on the backs of the most vulnerable who live and work in the State, nor does it balance the books by destroying the services that are the most needed for a safe and secure environment.

Denying Responsibility!

From 2009 through the first week of January and even on the day of the Attempt Assassination of the Democrat Washington Representative Gifford, Democrats have called on the Republican Leaders to 'Tone Down The Violent Rhetoric' that Republicans have spewed against the Democrat Representatives.

But the only responses from the Republican Leaders has always been that the violent rhetoric is protected under "Freedom of Speech." Really? Violent rhetoric is nowhere listed in the 'Bill of Rights' as being 'Freedom of Speech'. In fact in most, if not all, the States in the United States of American there has been a law in the USA that Violent Rhetoric of death threats or Violent Rhetoric to bring about physical harm to any citizen in the USA is considered a 'TERRORIST THREAT'.

The only other responses from the Republican Leaders and the Republican commentaries is that people feel frustrated and this is the only response anyone can get across. John Boehner and other Republican Representatives in Washington have said that they will NOT tell their constituents what they cannot say.

Really? Is it really their Constituents who are saying those words, or is it the Republican Representatives and the Republican Spokes people, and the Republican Talking Heads who are the ones stating those violent rhetoric across the USA?

Republican Congressman John Boehner, the Congress Leader, the Republican Congress Majority Leader himself who back in 2010 stated a violent rhetoric himself. It was John Boehner who said that if you don't like the results in Washington and Congress it is time to get your gun. In shock I saw him and heard him speak those words in the media on TV.

In 2009 it was Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell who, along with other Republican Representatives in Washington, while holding an enlarged picture poster of Pelosi on the balcony of the building in Washington who kept hitting and violently gesturing a motion with his hand and arm movement against Pelosi's giant picture in front of the First Gathering of the Tea Party, a movement bought and paid for by the company Koch Industries and their subsidiaries. FYI: grassroots movements are from the bottom up. Unlike the Tea Party which was from the Top down.

In 2009 Sarah Palin got into the act with her posting of the Map with shot sites on the locations on the map of Democrat Congress offices at their local state offices along with the addresses and names of the Democratic Congress on her own web pages. Her own Facebook page and her own Political page. However, just recently after the attempted assassination of Gifford, someone associated with Palin did get rid of the map on Sarah's political page.

From 2009 through 2010 much of Sarah Palin's speeches and talking points have always been using the Violent Rhetoric as she tells her audiences that when they don't get what they want from Washington, it's time to get their guns. Of course her most recent speeches has added the words, that she doesn't advocate violence. Yet with her gun message and her gun shot sites on a map of Democratic Congress state locations that was posted on her Political Page which just recently removed the map, and her Facebook page it has all the proof of being Violent.

From 2009 through 2010 Rush Lumbard stated many of his Violent Rhetoric such as: if you don't get your way in Washington then it is your duty to get your gun. In fact Recently in the past few months of 2010, Rush Lumbard even stated a Violent Rhetoric against our First Lady Michelle Obama.

And now here we are, on the Monday after the Saturday morning Attempted Assassination of Democratic Arizona 8th District Congresswoman Gabrielle Gifford. The Attempted Assassination by Jared L Loughner was planned well in advance. The proof of the Attempted Assassination being planned in advance and premeditated was on his blogging days, weeks before stating that this was going to be his lasts postings, along with a letter he had in his safe in his room. That letter had the word Assassinate and the name of Democrat Congress member Gifford as his target.

The definition of Assassination is to target to murder of a prominent person, a political figure for political reasons.

The points in the definition of assassination was in much of the Violent Rhetoric and gestures stated and or done by Republican Leaders, Republican Representatives, Republican Politicians, Republican Talking Heads. Why do I say this? Because the Republicans from Boehner to Mitch to Palin to Rush Lumbard to Bech all Targeted Democratic Prominent and Political figures for Political reasons in their own VIOLENT RHETORIC against the Democratic Party as a whole.

These past few days all we are getting from the Republican Leaders, Republican Politicians and Republican Spokes people, like Congressional Republican House Leader John Boehner, Senate Republican Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Republican Politician Ex-Governor Sarah Palin, Rush Lumbard, Bech, and other Republicans in both houses in Washington is TOTAL DENIAL!

Today Monday January 10 2011 the Republican Talking heads in the News Media and their Reporters are making statements that even though the letter had the name of Gifford in the letter with the word assassinate, those Republican talking head reporters are making statements that there is no proof of attempted assassinate. Wow, talk about Denial.

Warning of Double Dip?

Let's see what does the news media have to say about unemployment now and the economy? Oh yeah, they are stating that unemployment will rise even though the stimulus created a lot more jobs than what was believed.

What, unemployment is still high? Why is unemployment expected to rise? According to different money news and economic news experts on various news stations, many businesses and companies are cutting back to hold on to their money, since they are unable to get those loans and credit from the Banks and Credit Financial loan companies which was suppose to stimulate the economy with the help of that stimulus.

What? Didn't they get their stimulus money, the same stimulus money they suppose to use to stimulate the economy? And didn't they pay it all back with interest after getting totally out of the RED?

Of course they did. But it is an election year.

The Democrats did dare to pass that Financial Reform Bill earlier this summer. And since it is an election year, the Banks and Credit Financial Loan Companies are mad as heck at the Democrats for passing that Financial Reform bill. So as a form of protest the Banks, Credit Finanical Loan Companies along with Wall Street Companies and Insurance Corporations have all backed the Republican 'Just-Say-Hell-NO-Party' in hoping that the Republicans will go in and Reverse that Financial Reform Bill. They are angry and are funding the Republican's message which has duped so many Americans into believing that Reversing the Financial Reform Bill is good for them.

So in their form of protest, the Banks and Credit Financial Loan companies, have held back those loans and credits for most businesses, thus helping to EXTEND the unemployment situation while creating more unemployment to get voters behind the Republicans. Yep those Banks, Credit Financial Loan Companies, Wall Street and Republicans are teaching the average Middle Class American a lesson in economics alright.

They are teaching us that we, the Average Middle Class American, need not apply for the right to expect them, the Banks - Credit Financial Loan Companies - Wall Street, to play by the rules and regulations in any Financial Reform Bill, because with the help of Republicans, they the Banks - Credit Financial Loan companies - Wall Street, will always have their way.

So go ahead and vote Republican in November and just watch how the Republicans get the Banks, Credit Financial Loan Companies, Wall Street off the hook for what they did in the pass while Republicans allow them to do as they please again so they can go back to destroying our economy.

While the Republicans controlled the Senate and Congress their decisions have always favored with the Banks, Financial companies and Wall Street Companies. In 1999 Republican Senate and Republican Congress passed the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act which allowed for the first time since 1933 the commercial Banks, Investment Banks, Securities Firms, and Insurance Companies to consolidate.

Well the Act was passed in 1999. But in 1998 Citibank and Smith Barney and Primerica and Travelers had already consolidated before that bill was passed making their merger a violation of both the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 and the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956. So the Republican Senate and Republican Congress Bill of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act had a notation of back tracking the bill one year to make the Consolidation of the bank company, securities company, and the insurance company merger forming the Citicorp Corporation of 1998 legal thus protecting Citibank and Smith Barney and Primerica and Travelers from being prosecuted for any violations. Because of the Republican 1999 Act that allowed the merger from the previous year the Republican's Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act became known as the Financial Services Industry bill.

The Banks, Credit companies, Loan Companies, Insurance companies and Wall Street can always count on Republicans to sell their souls to the highest bidder. And you can bet that the Banks, credit companies, loan companies, insurance companies and wall street companies are all happy that the Republicans are very good at convincing the Average Middle Class American Citizens that it is the unemployed and the Police Officers and the Fire Departments and the Teachers in our country who should be considered the Special Interests Groups.

So will you be duped into voting for Republicans who work tirelessly against the Average Middle Class American Workers and their families? If you dare vote Republican, you definitely have been duped!